← All Episodes
AI for Humans

Grok-2 Is Actually Good, Google's Huge AI Updates & More AI News

Join our Patreon: XAI surprised us all with the drop of Grok-2 and it’s actually very good, Google’s new Pixel event was AI heavy as Gemini Voice looks to steal Ope…

Grok-2 Is Actually Good, Google's Huge AI Updates & More AI News

Join our Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/AIForHumansShow

XAI surprised us all with the drop of Grok-2 and it’s actually very good, Google’s new Pixel event was AI heavy as Gemini Voice looks to steal OpenAI’s thunder. OpenAI *did* drop a new model but it wasn’t the rumored Strawberry…at least not yet. Plus, AI crowds, way more Flux content and a special guest co-host Ben Relles who worked at YouTube forever and now in Reid Hoffman’s office!

Kevin will be returning soon - OR WILL HE?!? (just kidding, he will)

Follow us for more on X @AIForHumansShow

Join our TikTok @aiforhumansshow

And to contact or book us for speaking/consultation, please visit our website: https://www.aiforhumans.show/

// Show Links //

Grok (available on X Premium)

https://x.com/i/grok

Flux on XAI

https://x.com/bfl_ml/status/1823614223622062151

LMSYS Benchmarks

https://x.com/lmsysorg/status/1823599819551858830

Grok + Flux Examples

https://x.com/minchoi/status/1823698502909641144

Kermit’s Situation

https://x.com/AIForHumansShow/status/1823580442462957930

Google's GEMINI LIVE 

https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/13/24219553/google-gemini-live-voice-chat-mode

Near Demo Fail

https://x.com/tsarnick/status/1823469426437710133

Pixel 9 Call Notes Feature

https://www.androidheadlines.com/2024/08/pixel-9-call-notes.html

Marques Brownlee on Pixel’s Add Me Feature

https://youtu.be/63EVXf_S4WQ?si=bpNkjlflbIi6ehgP

OpenAI Has Updated it’s GPT-4o Model 

https://x.com/ChatGPTapp/status/1823109016223957387

The AI Crowds Controversy

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-falsely-claims-harris-campaign-ai-alter-photo/story?id=112776213

Wired’s Guide On How To Tell This Isn’t AI

https://www.wired.com/story/kamala-harris-rally-crowds-ai-trump-conspiracy/

Levelsio Using Flux To Create Models of Own Face

https://x.com/levelsio/status/1823199030199075277

Runway Gen-3 + Live Portrait = AI Liveblogger

https://x.com/EccentrismArt/status/1823059492520788342

Eleven Labs ASMR Voices

https://x.com/AIForHumansShow/status/1823046209294193020

Search ASMR in the ElevenLabs Voice Library

https://elevenlabs.io/app/voice-library

Reid Hoffman Meets His AI Twin (Reid AI)

https://youtu.be/rgD2gmwCS10?si=f4NBVQqGS7FYSXbE

Ben Relles on LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/benrelles/

Real Creative (Ben’s Website)

https://realcreative.ai/

 

Big shocker, Grok 2 has dropped, and it's good.
We'll tell you how Elon and the team at XAI somehow slipped near the top
of the leaderboards in the AI race and are integrating Flux to make
some, let's just say, some very weird AI images available for everyone.
Then, Google's huge new Pixel event where they unveiled and
shipped a new AI voice assistant.
Where's OpenAI in all this?
We're not sure yet.
We're really hoping to get advanced voice soon.
Sam, please.
Speaking of OpenAI, they did release a small update to
their flagship model, GPT 40.
Flux has updated a lot of stuff, and oh my god, I forgot,
Kevin can't be here this week.
We need a new co host.
What is this?
Where am I?
That's right, Ben Rellis is here on a new AI for Humans.
Okay.
. Welcome.
Welcome.
Welcome, everybody.
It is AI for Humans, your weekly guide to the wonderful world of generative AI.
We are here to demystify all the AI news and tools, and today, Kevin is not here.
He will be back next week, but I am joined by a new co host.
We are joined by Ben Rellis.
Welcome, Ben.
Hey, thanks for having me.
Love this show.
, and Ben, you and I have known each other for a very long time.
We go way, way back.
In fact, all the way back to the G4 days.
And tell us a little bit about what you're doing now in the AI space, because
you and I have been talking about AI for the last, what, two years now.
G4 Days, so that was like 2007 2008.
I was starting as a YouTube creator and it was, a big deal when your video
was featured on Attack of the Show.
So that's how we first met.
I was a YouTube creator from like 2007 to 2011.
Then I actually sold my channel as part of an acquisition to YouTube.
I was at YouTube from 2011 to 2021, and then I've spent the last few
years working with Reid Hoffman mostly focused on AI generated content, both
for companies that he's invested in.
But also some projects that actually feature read.
Cause he likes experimenting with all these tools like you do.
so read actually is doing this thing where he's got an AI avatar and you actually
brought me a question from read AI.
Is that right?
I did.
Yes.
This is a question to Gavin from read.
Ben, the funny thing about this is I would say almost every decision we made on
the show went against the grain, because we were putting the internet on TV at a
time where TV didn't trust the internet, we were trying to make, I wouldn't say
stars out of people on YouTube, but like, it was really, to us, the beginning
stages of something, and one of the things that we could talk about, we could
talk about this later in the show, is, Obviously, we're in another inflection
point as to how media is going to change.
I think right now the AI media space is very similar to 2006, 2008 YouTube.
And I think you and I can dive into that a little bit later.
But we're also going to hear more from Read AI later, which I'm excited about
before.
got more questions.
Yeah, but before we do that, let's jump into the news.
Okay, Ben, we had a big news week in AI this week, and probably nothing bigger
and more breaking than Grok 2, which was surprising to me because Grok is
XAI and Twitter slash X, whatever you want to call it now, their AI platform.
Elon has been talking a lot lately about how much money
he's spending on Grok training.
He has been bragging about the number of H100s that he
is going to put towards Grok.
And Grok 2 has come out overnight, and is actually really good.
It has come in at number three on the LMS training board, which is a
surprise to me because I don't know, Ben, if you had used Grok when it
first came out, but my experience with it was in general, not amazing.
Yeah, I used it and uh, I thought it was impressive in some areas
and maybe lacking in others.
It is interesting though.
Like I try all of the different image and video tools.
And then for the LLMs, I started with GPT 4 and I ended up
doing almost everything there.
So I can't say I gave it like, the full number of reps, maybe
to have a strong opinion on it.
I had a similar sort of experience.
In general, my problem with it was, which I always thought grok, if you're
going to use grok and you're going to integrate it directly into Twitter slash
X real time search, would it be such a useful thing that you could do with it?
Because there's no better real time engine, or at least there
wasn't, it may be a little worse now than what Twitter was, right?
It wasn't working that well before.
What's interesting about this now, I think more so than almost the real
time stuff is they've now dropped what is, I think could be a small issue.
Flux, which we've talked a lot about on the show over the last couple of
weeks Flux is a brand new open source AI image model from some of the team that
made stable diffusion, and it is making really good, really realistic images.
And now Flux has been integrated into Grok without some of the.
Let's just say specific.
I don't want to use the word censorship because it's not like these
companies are censoring, but it's
much more permissive.
Yeah.
It's much more permissive.
So there's been some really interesting images that have come out of Grok.
Min Choi, who does a great job of collecting a bunch of different sorts of
things, created some stuff where you can see what Flux, , is good at, it makes,
good text, there's a great picture that Dreaming Tulpa made where you see a
woman staring at the camera \ actually has embroidered words saying, follow
at Dreaming Tulpa um, uh, Images of George Washington, which we know have
been a problem for other image models.
I also am a little worried, though, because I, yesterday, used it to
generate an image of Kermit the Frog doing cocaine, which it did.
Didn't exactly have him with his nose in it, but there's a plate of white
powder in front of Kermit, and he is looking a little screwed up in some ways.
This is not necessarily about Grock, but I think the more interesting thing
to me about this is X slash Twitter is a mainstream platform, and now we
have, , a cutting edge image model.
Like the top of the line AI image model available to what
I would refer to as the masses.
Where does this go from here?
What do you think about this?
lot of things.
I think there's some areas of it where I'm like, this could
be incredible and so exciting.
We're going to see, the individual from his bedroom be able to create a full film.
And then there's also, of course, Kermit doing Coke that is nerve wracking and
how are we going to put guardrails around this and make sure that's not everywhere.
Probably with a number of the examples that we'll talk about the
show, that's the case where it's
like, As much as I'm excited about this being a incredible wave of like new
creativity put in the hands of people that wasn't there before it is also
both from the example you used, but also of course, like when you combine
that with video, something that starts to get really scary as you talk about,
an election year and everything else.
That said, I do feel like especially the last month has been the most exciting
since I've been tracking all this
stuff in terms of like how quickly you're starting to see things that
aren't just impressive because they're AI, but are also just really compelling
entertainment videos, et cetera.
It, what's interesting to me is there's a lot of people in the AI space who are
like, Oh, we've hit a bump or generative AI is going to not go much further.
And I will say, we've said this on the show before, but like clearly the powers
that be, including the CTOs of Microsoft and all these people outside of just like
you would refer to as the AI companies themselves are disagreeing with that.
They believe the scaling is going to keep going.
The thing I think that is those people, maybe the hardcore AI people don't
fully understand is that the vast majority of the world has not really
seen what these tools are capable of.
And I think video and audio specifically bring an entirely different space to that.
You know this from working at YouTube forever.
You saw, YouTube grow from what was like a pretty small service.
Never was like super small, but like into what is now the world's
largest, video company by far.
Do you see that kind of pathway happening now that these image and video tools
are getting available to everybody?
Yeah.
I think combination of like available and easier to use and with YouTube and
we both talked about, these analogies, but I think For so long, YouTube
was, billions of viewers, but still, most people weren't making videos.
on YouTube because it still took editing and final cut and all this stuff.
And then, for all of the different companies that had different, plays to
compete with YouTube, it was TikTok that really made like video creation so easy
that made that blow up.
And you could do it on your phone.
You didn't need to open up editing tools.
And I think there's a similar thing here.
There's like This incredible community of creators that are using these
tools, but it's still relatively small because most of them you can't
just open up and start, creating videos and see them minutes later.
And I do track a lot of these quick plug real creative.
ai put up a couple
Oh yeah.
So I try to track all these things.
What you start to find is that it's a lot of the same names over and over
again that are leaned in, Curious Refuge and Dave Clark and, Karen Chang and all
these people that are experimenting, but they're really good at it.
And so they can, have the patience and the skill to build something.
And I think part of the answer to your question is.
Not only is it about these tools being available, but it's like the easier they
get to use and the better they get, the more we'll start seeing like the volume
of videos that don't just feel like experiments that feel like, Oh,
this is actually like building an audience around a narrative series.
And I think distribution is a big part of that, right?
Which is why this is exciting and scary at the same time.
Like I think there's a little bit of, and this is not a diss
because I do this myself, the, 1000 monkeys can type Shakespeare.
That was always the interesting thing about YouTube in some ways is it
wasn't just about what was being made.
It was about the volume of that was, of what was being made so that there
will be things that, that climb to the top that are really good.
And I think that's probably the same case with this.
overlaps with YouTube a little bit in that I think early YouTube,
there was actually more narrative content in the top hundred channels.
You
had Freddie W, and Mystery Guitar Man, and all the sketch comedy.
And a lot of that got replaced, largely because of an algorithm change, by
individuals, first person content.
So I don't think that like, narrative content is going to overtake YouTube.
But to your point about the volume, as more and more people are starting
to figure out how to do animation, or put themselves in action sequences.
My hope is we actually see like more of that short form storytelling on
creator platforms, which, really isn't like a big part of the top
hundred thousand channels on YouTube.
Most of them are like very first person because that's what's practical to create,
That makes perfect sense.
And again, I think this is like where what's exciting
about the space right here.
Please like and subscribe this video on YouTube.
And always, forever, leave us five star reviews on all the podcast platforms.
We are available there.
And go to our Patreon.
\ we do have a Patreon right now that people are starting to drop a
little bit of a tip jar change into.
So let's move on to the other big news of this week, which is Google's pixel event.
And at Google's pixel event, there were a ton of AI updates.
They unveiled Gemini live, a brand new audio assistant kind of surprised me.
Their take on open AI is advanced voice.
And, you know, it's not.
Bad.
It actually does look like it's something that's pretty good.
I haven't tried it yet because I'm stuck in the iPhone ecosystem, but it is
available right now for a lot of people, which is different than advanced voice.
Supposedly advanced voice will be available for all chat
GPT plus users in September.
It's trickling out right now, but not everybody has it.
Now you can have a free flowing conversation with Gemini.
You can interrupt when you think of something important or change
topics as the conversation flows.
When I first go live with Gemini, there will be 10 different
voices for me to choose from.
Let's meet a few.
Great.
Let's get going.
Here's one of the voices I have.
I'm looking forward to discussing with you the world's most profound questions,
like why is pickleball so popular?
That is profound.
Uh, let's, let's try one more.
Or maybe you'd like to listen to a voice like this.
A pretty great one if I do say so myself, but don't worry,
there are more to explore.
Hi, Gemini.
How are you doing?
Hi there.
I'm doing well.
Thanks for asking.
It's always nice to hear from someone.
How can I help you today?
I think this is a really interesting step in the right direction for Google Gemini.
I assume, Ben, that you do not have a Pixel phone either, or do you?
I don't have a pixel phone, so I saw the demos, but I haven't used it yet.
The demos to me were, like, interesting and great.
, but in a lot of ways, this feels super useful, especially if you are in the
Google ecosystem, more so than some of the other stuff I've seen from Google lately.
Yeah, first of all, in terms of it not working seamlessly in the demo.
I've been there.
All the demos we're doing today are live, by the way.
So if I happen to come across this concert poster for Sabrina Carpenter,
I'll just open Gemini, take a photo,
and ask, Check my calendar and see if I'm free when she's coming
to San Francisco this year.
Gemini pulls relevant content from the image, connects with my calendar, and
gives me the information I'm looking for.
Oh, looks like we had a little demo issue.
Let me try one more time.
All
We used to do live demos at YouTube all the time, and I think they're
helpful and they almost always work.
But, sometimes they don't.
I've had it happen to me.
But in terms of the actual.
Once you saw what it was doing.
I thought it was really impressive.
To me, that is, the biggest hurdle for voice conversations.
Is it feeling like real time?
And I'm sure you've done these demos where you're like,
showing somebody a conversation.
But even if it's like a second and a half before
the answers, you're like, Oh, yeah.
It'll get to it and it just doesn't feel natural.
And so the, combination of that and multi modality and being able to feel like
it's watching something alongside with you, I think is another one of those.
It's a matter of, milliseconds, but it makes a really big difference in
how natural people feel like it is.
And it seemed like Gemini was like another big step in that direction.
Again, it's about shipping this thing.
That's really interesting because getting in people's
hands is going to be a big deal.
My issue in general with some of these AI tools is that they'll get shipped
and then people don't really fully understand how to use them or end up don't
making them part of their daily life.
I keep thinking that advanced voice mode, the clips that I've seen of it
once it rolls out to everybody that is really chat GT's, like secret
weapon because we've talked about pi,
So Ben has worked with Pi and Inflection before because Reid is a co founder there.
And what was always fascinating to me about Pi was they got to
that voice thing super early and I still think this is the killer app
Pi was sort of combination of voice, but also emotional intelligence.
So in having the conversation, you started to feel like it was
talking to you like a human.
I of course pushed myself to use it a lot because.
I was working with inflection, but once I did, after a few days, it did
become just like regular habit in the car, conversation for 10 minutes
or, with somebody and brainstorming.
I actually felt like once I learned how to ask questions, how to pause
it from talking all those things.
It became very practical and it was like one of the few
apps that I opened every day.
But yeah, to your point a lot of it was just feeling like it was a
natural conversation and , there's something that feels more natural to
me about having AirPods in and talking.
We should take a pause here to talk about the thing you've been playing around with
voice AIs because voice AIs obviously are super powerful You showed me something
that I was really impressed by You made a voice AI for your own grandmother, right?
Is that
I did.
I did.
Yeah.
After the fact, so my grandmother turned a hundred in April, I made a kind of
15 minute documentary about her life.
And then after I had made this, I shouldn't say documentary, little
film, photos, old videos, Yeah., as I'm editing it, I'm not a documentary
filmmaker, I'm like, oh, she didn't even say anything about, her dad, she
told this one story, but I need her like saying this one line about her dad, and I
could really use her, talking about this.
It was really helpful actually, use the Levin Labs.
And created the, voice clone of my grandmother, Eileen Chudnow.
And sure enough, about like 15 percent of this thing are lines.
I would call her up and say can you quick tell me something about Aunt Barb?
She would tell me something.
And then I could put that in the VO and that project is probably one of my
favorite projects I worked on this year,
because it actually, the AI tools did bring a lot of these old,
like photos and stories to life.
And we did some things with motion and we were able to expand photos.
So I thought it actually was.
A good way to help tell her life story.
Separate from that though, then we created, similar to the read AI thing,
a version using hour one where we can now have Graham Eileen talk about
the 76 ERs season AI I sent you.
I don't know if you can play a clip of her kind of like explaining AI.
But, it's don't know what the use case is yet, but definitely my family got
a kick seeing her walk through, her predictions for sports teams, artificial
intelligence, pop music, et cetera.
All right, let, yeah, let's play the clip where Ben's grandmother
surprised the rest of her family by using some words that you might not
normally hear the grandmother say.
consider this a W video from your grandma Eileen.
Some of you been asking what I have been up to.
Just beat COVID's ass.
Light work.
By the way, Eden, you're my least favorite great grandchild, my far eat shit loser.
Well, that's all from your old grandma Eileen in these 30 seconds.
Bless your heart, sweetie.
This is amazing.
We love Grandma Eileen.
She's amazing.
Tell her thank you for that.
I'll tell her I should clarify.
So read AI is built on All his books and speeches, that's really meant to
say things that the real read would say.
The Gram Eileen version is my nephew and nieces playing with having her say
different things, but it's not based on what the real Gram Eileen would say.
Just
Totally fair, and then just for our audience, for those of you who don't know,
the difference there is Grandma Eileen's voice was trained on Eleven Lab, so you
can make her say what she says in her voice, whereas Reed's stuff, you put in
all sorts of books and speeches into an LLM, trained it on that, and then had that
write the words for Reed, is that correct?
Exactly.
So
when he's asking you a question, he knows to not only like review your
LinkedIn page, but also to pull in things from Blitzscaling and review
and impromptu in his own writing.
A couple cool more Google AI things that came out of the Pixel event.
First of all, there was a really interesting call notes feature
that allows you to basically get your notes directly from a call.
It does have this weird voice where it says you're now being recorded.
But that's not that different than something in Zoom.
Even better, Marques Brownlee, who I know you and I both love did a really
interesting demo of the AdMe feature, which is a very cool thing that allows you
to take a picture of a group of people.
If you're the one taking the picture, You snap a photo and then you can actually
use AI to walk around, have somebody else take the picture and then put you in it.
Ben, you know Marquez for a while, but like, obviously we love
Marquez covering this content, but this feature is pretty cool.
It is a cool feature.
Yeah.
Also, Marques Brownlee, one of the YouTube GOATs, he's phenomenal.
I am conflicted about this one because on the one hand, I totally get it.
You want to remove somebody from a photo, add somebody to a photo.
But then I did see an interview with Kevin Rose, I think on a podcast.
And he was like, I would never use a feature like this.
Once you're
playing with a memory, it just feels like a slippery slope.
And he's not going to ever take somebody out of an image, put somebody into an
image with his own personal photos.
And I see both sides.
Part of me is like, well, yeah, with my four best friends on a mountain
alone, I want to get that great shot.
And then
part of me is like, that's weird to have a photo on your wall
that didn't actually happen.
I don't know where I fit on those two.
I really, and also I'm six foot five.
I used to like that people like give Ben the phone.
He can do the selfie.
He's got
the long arms.
Give it to Ben, he'll get us all in.
And now you don't even need me and my, selfie arms.
But no, I really like, there's so many things like this where part of
me feels like, yeah, that's great.
I could make my, grandmother tell stories about growing up.
And then part of me, it's like, That's weird to have somebody listen to a story
That was AI generated.
Just interview her and have her tell the story.
So I, yeah, I definitely see both sides.
I think I lean towards where Kevin Rose is where unless I like have to do it, I'm not
adding myself to a photo next to friends.
If it didn't happen.
Ben, I hate to tell you this is a generational thing and kids that grow
up with it are just going to use it and
have no problem whatsoever.
So we are going to have a weird world going forward.
We're going to move on now to our next story, which is OpenAI has released
a new model, secretly and silently, and then they talked about it.
It is not a real new model, it's an update to their flagship model, but the long
TLDR story is there was a relatively small Twitter account that got very big and
leaked some information that supposedly has to do with not only This update,
but then the GPT five slash GPT next, we don't know how much of that is true.
Supposedly this person says it's coming on Thursday, but
we believe this is all a troll.
Now the more important thing here, Ben, is that open AI has updated
their frontier model slightly with a better reasoning engine.
It seems like it is doing slightly better on math.
And some people are hinting that this is the pathway to what is
rumored as strawberry, which is a much better reasoning model built on LLMs
I know this is a complicated story and it's a little bit It's become a little
bit bigger than it seems to be right now where do you see open AI going?
there's some people who would say based on the grok updates or the
Gemini updates that open AI is falling back and that The moat that they had
created, which was really about how far they had advanced, maybe dissipating.
Where do you see open AI kind of in the current AI space?
I haven't been following all of the different strawberry teases.
I was traveling the last couple of days.
I'm not fully up to speed.
And I do feel like because it's open AI, people are always going
to get like more attention, more excitement about what's coming next.
But yeah, I think for me, like I said, it reminds me a little bit of maybe
like you go to Spotify and then that becomes your platform and it takes a
lot to move over to a different music service that's similar, that's been
like my experience with GPT 4, I'm just so used to using it that I get
very excited about updates because, you feel like you can immediately see, how
those changes impact your use with it.
So yeah, I don't know.
I'm I've been loyal to GPT for I try all the other stuff
and I guess everybody else.
I have no inside info.
Excited to see what's next.
Honestly, that is a point that I don't think is talked about enough.
And I think this is something you and I who are old enough to have been
through enough product cycles to see.
And this kind of goes back to the X thing.
part of it is where you spend your time, what is the place that
you feel most comfortable in?
Because a lot of people in the AI space are jumping from.
GPT four to Claude to many different pathways, like Lama, all these different
things, they're jumping back and forth, but honestly, I'm like you, like mostly
what I do, even though Claude is great, I don't right now pay for Claude, Kevin
plays for Claude, but I pay for chat, GPT plus, and I get most of what I need out
of GPT plus ultimately, it might be more of like a branding marketing thing, right?
If the moats get smaller and smaller now, my theory is that I think GPT
five or an extra, whatever it is probably not as far away as the
next levels of these next things.
So they will probably have a significant like advantage
when they drop that next thing.
But.
With Mark Zuckerberg talking about Llama 4 coming next year, obviously Elon going
hard on Grok, like it does feel more and more like these might become equalized
in terms of their intelligence level.
What is it gonna be like in a world where, you know, I always laugh about
the fact that apps are now advertised on CNN, like you see an advertisement
for an app because that's how you get attention for apps now, like you have to
advertise them to people on television.
Do you think we're entering a world where That's going to be the case.
There's going to be like five to seven different models and they're all similar.
And it's just going to be about who can garner the most attention.
Yeah, I mean, sometimes it's also like specific use cases.
I don't have the answers to all these, but if 1 is really good at
math, it might build an audience.
That's they're the best with math.
And if another 1 is really good at brainstorming, that finds a community the
same way that I don't know, maybe yeah.
Max appeal to creative people and, PCs, appeal to a different audience.
So I think there could be some of that where they build reputations,
not only through marketing, but they actually do things really well.
And then, yeah, there's so many analogies of AI that I try to catch myself.
I felt I went to some of these AI conferences and everybody talked about
like the comparison to photography and how, AI is similar because people
were scared of photography and then it ended up being this wonderful thing.
And.
One analogy maybe here is that to me, the iPhone updates at
some point were like overkill.
The,
The camera, it was fine.
I could stay with an iPhone 12 for three years and not feel like I got
that much more with the next phone.
And I do wonder with some of these updates, if for some people like,
Oh my gosh, I can plan my whole business now with this, this is.
But for the average user, they're like, yeah, I can still sort of like ask for
suggestions for what to do in Arizona.
And it's pretty similar as it
was before.
Think the other side of this is, we talk a lot about AGI in the show,
this idea that all these companies are shooting for an artificial general
intelligence that can do a lot of stuff.
And It might just be that like there's going to be like a very high level
machine learning intelligence that will solve the big problems, right?
Which like in the dream world, there's a you set, you send an AI off for a month
and it comes back with something new from physics and then we could take that and
break it down all these different ways.
That is not the way that we're currently using AI.
So it might just be that like for the masses, the consumers, AI will just
trickle out and get better and better.
And these larger models will be used for the big problems in some form or not.
totally.
And it's so hard to predict years down the road, what is this going to look like?
And I'm actually put together like a breakfast in LA where it was Reed and
like six of the top creatives in AI.
You would know a lot of them.
It was like
Don Allen and Terrence Southern.
And and I asked at the table, like, where does everybody think
this is going to be in five years?
And, some people answered and then that same night read was on a panel with
JJ Abrams and he like said something.
I'm like, I'm not going to ask the dumb question.
Where is this going to be in 5 years?
Because nobody could ever possibly know.
I was like, was that aimed at me?
I just asked that this morning and then, and then 2 days
later, he was interviewing.
He's I'm not going to ask the dumb question.
Where is this going to be in 5 years?
So anyways, I told him that story.
But it's like I do think there's an element of.
It's so hard to, cause you were asking like, where do you think
this is going to go to really have an understanding, like longer term,
what this is going to look like,
There's another story that kind of ties into this, which is,
I don't talk about politics a lot, but it is political season.
I think it's important to discuss this conversation around the
crowds issue that has come up.
There are two candidates in the presidential race and of course, One
of them has had a surge recently.
Kamala, there was a change in the presidential candidates and Kamala Harris
saw that.
yeah
yeah, and Donald Trump has basically said that the crowds that she is drawing in
one specific event were actual AI and, and, and Ben, I don't know if it's as
important to talk about what Trump has said here, but more about the idea of how
we tell people the images are not AI and think in different ways to look at it.
Wired wrote a really good article, which I hope to see more of, which
is basically giving people the educative tools to understand when
something is AI and what it is not.
And one of the most interesting things about this is, do
multiple angles of this exist?
Can you see multiple places?
And I think that's an important thing to come across.
We should just be clear, it wasn't AI in this instance, but
Totally.
I was going to say I'm not a newscaster, but that case, 100 percent was not AI.
There's video, there's other angles, not AI.
Yeah.
But it does open this conversation about deep fakes are not just about
the times when they are actually faking information, it becomes a situation where
it changes the ability for people to say, oh, that was a deep fake if it wasn't.
And I think that's a weird world that we're entering.
I know you speak and talk a lot about AI and obviously working with Reed
must think about this stuff a lot.
How do you educate people to understand this stuff so that specifically they
don't get caught in a loop of believing things that aren't necessarily true?
I can't say that's exactly my role, educating people on how they can not
get caught in a loop, but that would be a good thing for me to learn.
That's, that sounds like a smart thing for me to be able to do.
I think that.
I thought the obvious way that AI could potentially be used in a negative
way would be to create an image of something that didn't happen, it goes
viral, and everybody thought, oh, this candidate was, smoking a cigarette
with so and so, but actually, AI generated, right?
And that might happen.
And then the other use case is this instance where it's like, something
really did happen, but because AI imagery is getting so good, you can
credibly put out something that says the crowd wasn't that big, which is like,
you know, big issue to Donald Trump.
So that once it's out there, it puts that seed in people like, does
you really have those crowd sizes or whatever it is, and it could be
something more serious than that.
And it's really tough as a content creator to even know because I saw
like one video that was, can you believe what this guy is doing?
He put up an AI generated image.
Here's how we prove it.
But it doesn't necessarily mean that person even knew they were using an AI
generated image.
So there does, yeah, really, Necessitate a need for like how as
quickly as possible can people verify whether an image is real or not.
And there's a lot of companies working hard to be the solution to that.
And honestly, I think this is where, and not that I trust necessarily
what's going on at X from this side, but I do believe social media can
actually help in this way in some form.
And there's a lot of arguments that like, obviously.
It can dissuade people and it can do stuff.
But part of it is about how much signal you can get on something,
? Like in general, I have seen people be very good on signal on things
like this pretty quickly and pretty honestly, because if somebody is
dishonestly trying to say something, it does come across relatively fast.
And this is where you can percentage wise determine how many people are
saying something is real versus not.
There's like a certain number of yeah, platforms where it's a
scrolling feed and I don't know, it's tough to know how horrifying
one individual user's experiences.
Mine was saw some weird thing about was, that rally, a fake image.
In front of the plane, but then two videos later, it was like disproved.
And then I was like, I had seen enough in it, but somebody else's feed
could just be like video after video,
convincing them that like the whole, campaign momentum is a mirage and
not happening and it's so hard.
And I think about that with my own kids too.
And I don't love the scrolling platforms for that reason,
because.
It can be a really great experience for some people, but for other people,
the same platform can be a nightmare.
So that to me, to your point about like social media being helpful, I think
some platforms are better than others.
My
guess is if you're scrolling through videos, you can't count on the
videos correcting something that was misinformation seven videos earlier.
Yeah.
No, that actually, that makes a lot of sense and it is something
to be really worried about.
Time to look at some of the stuff we saw on AI this week that we weren't
able to try, but we want to shout out.
It's really cool.
It's time for AI.
See what you did there.
Sometimes you're scrollin without a care, Then suddenly you stop and shout.
Hey, I see what you did there.
Hey, I see what you did there.
So Ben, one of the most interesting things that has come out in the
last couple of weeks is flux.
As we talked about with the Grok update, flux is a new open
source AI model for imaging.
And it is doing some really interesting stuff.
Levioso, who is a very interesting follow on X, has created what a
lot of people have now done, which is a Laura of their own face.
And he has been able to drop himself into all sorts of pictures to do stuff with,
and to talk about some of the things you discussed with, you know, Marquez's take
on Admi, or talking about Admi earlier.
Now you have photorealistic versions of yourself that can be anywhere early on
with stable diffusion, people were making apps that did this, but now it is going
to be very easy to do this for yourself.
And to the point that we made about Grok earlier, Grok could
conceivably roll this out.
It's a very cool thing.
It's super fun to play with them.
But again, it does feel like there's a couple of images that Levioso makes
with like him putting his arm around Donald Trump or his face as Donald Trump.
And like, it does cross that line a little bit sometimes is like, well,
you could put people into something, but did that actually happen?
Or what was it like?
. I know.
I know.
My all time favorite photo of myself.
Okay.
Not including family photos.
I do have a photo of me and President Obama.
We're shaking hands.
We're both smiling.
Now anybody can have that photo.
And that is like, you know, the moment that I'm so glad it's captured on film.
And then it is very bizarre with video, not just photos.
I work with a guy named Parth.
He created
the LLM for Read AI.
Okay.
And um, he was just over yesterday and showing me a video where he took
one image of my face, put it on him.
He does a pretty good Ben impression.
I have to say I can send you the video if you
can put it in here.
But um, it was a little surreal.
I've seen those kinds of demos before from metaphysic and deep voodoo, but having it
done with your own face on somebody else, that's a friend of yours it's bizarre.
And it's interesting you mentioned Metaphysic and Deep Voodoo
who are both like large tech first companies that do this.
The thing that's crazy to me is the fact that it can be done off the shelf.
So actually, as you mentioned that, what's interesting, Partha's probably
using Live Portrait, which we've talked about on the show, which is an
interesting, plugin that allows you to use your face to act out stuff.
Well, Eccentrism Art actually used Live Portrait plus , Runway Gen 3,
to create what is a live blog looking thing of a woman talking to camera.
Hi there!
Okay, this is gonna sound really strange, but I had the weirdest dream last night.
Of course this has some editing involved in it, but Ben, when you're
watching this, what are your first reactions to what this looks like?
You can see like they try to get the nods and like trying to get
her to like, kind of be the thing.
Yeah.
Yeah, I haven't seen this.
What's so bizarre about this is lonely girl 15
was the first ever breakout series on YouTube, right?
And part of what made it such a wild story is that, lonely girl 15 was fake.
I still think it's one of the most innovative things
ever done with online video,
even though
I honestly with video period, I think cause it was
video period.
It was so smart.
It's a lot of what I based, the Obama girl series of videos that
I did was based on lonely girl 15
originally was going to be called Obama girl 15.
And she's going to be blogging about Obama,
but anyways, I just, I haven't seen this clip, but what's so interesting about it,
it definitely gave me like lonely girl 15 vibes and whereas that one was fake
as in like scripted and a real actress.
Playing the part of a blogger.
This is like next level, like lonely girl, 15, have a fake blogger,
create a whole story around them.
And yeah, it's, just, it's pretty, I, of course, I've been thinking
a lot about what does this mean for the creator community
when suddenly.
You're going to be able to have creators that might have that parasocial connection
and don't exist.
And what's, how's that going to play out?
But yeah, I hadn't seen a demo yet like that of a vlogger.
It's interesting because it just combines all the tools, right?
And I did a video on Monday, which was using the Flux Realism
Laura, which is what this is using to get the initial image.
So Flux Realism Laura is a way to use Flux that is trained on very realistic faces.
You've probably seen all those pictures of holding up like
Reddit I'm not real sort of cards.
It's really crazy.
I do think we're crossing into something pretty bonkers now though, right?
Because image to video tools have gotten really good.
You can see how they can make it a straightforward and then it just
becomes an editing issue, right?
Do you have a talented enough editor to make it feel right?
And as we know with YouTube, we've had 10 years of a generation
getting good at editing, right?
This is something where like editing is something that's like.
It's funny.
I was talking to my wife, who's a novelist the other day.
And she teaches writing to kids and tries to get people like, excited
about writing at a young age.
And I think kids almost editing is, is in that first skill set now, which is
Yeah, for
thing to think about.
Where it's like writing, drawing, and now editing.
That's a thing that people actually do at like five, which is a crazy
Yeah.
Yeah.
And prompting.
It's
interesting that if you can prompt these things the right way, you could
get someone to just vlog for 24 hours straight about all these different topics.
And, then have, another AI model pull out the best hot takes
and turn those into videos.
So yeah, it'll be wild to see where that goes
One other thing I wanted to point out is there was a great post
from one of our favorite ex users.
Her name is venture twins.
She found out that chat GPT can determine how tall people are with within an inch.
This is something I hear from my daughters.
My daughters are, 19 they talk about how.
Boys, including me, they try to explain me always lie about their
height and I am actually 5'11 and a half and my daughter's, I used to
call myself six foot and my daughter's giving me so much crap for it.
Anyway Justine was able to find out that chat GPT can, if you give it pictures
and put it in proximity, can tell how tall somebody is within an inch.
So like this is real world use case of AI
It's funny, this is the second time in this podcast I'm mentioning that I'm
6'5 so it seems like something that I work into every conversation when
I really don't, but, I'm 6'5 and yeah, it's funny after COVID,
I'd meet people all the time, and they're like, I had no idea you
were gigantic, because I spent two
years, on Zoom.
But to your point before, which again, this is people are talking about a
lot like, It's, it's very interesting that you could be conversing with
somebody over video and then when you meet them, not realize that
they looked, 25 percent better this,
All that stuff that like, yeah, not only is it like AI images, but it's
just like everyday conversations.
I don't know.
It feels like again, there needs to be like certain like societal norms
around don't change, your image if you're just facetiming with
your girlfriend, whatever.
Yeah.
I think it's going to be, IRL meetups are going to be much stranger because
you're going to have different looks at different people and everything.
And in some form, it's going to just get weirder.
All right we should talk a little bit about some of the weird
stuff we did with AI this week.
This is what we do and talk about the stuff we did get hands on with.
As I mentioned, I did go and play around with the phone.
Flux realism, Laura, please.
You can check out our YouTube video on that.
But the weirder thing I did.
Is 11 labs.
I was on 11 labs because of this.
I was trying to get a voice to use for this video.
And I saw that on 11 labs, there are now ASMR voices, Ben, which seems to
me to be a very bad idea, but maybe not because the ASMR people are out there.
So if you listen to this, just, I'm going to play this link here.
I just did something very quick and I just want to try and see what happened.
And it's pretty shocking.
This will not go well, not for you, not for us, nor for any of us.
Click.
Click.
Bruh.
Woah.
It's ASMR.
It's basically what those people are, have done for years.
And this woman maybe smartly created a very good model for it.
And this feels like a place then where AI could replace a lot of
people doing this thing, I assume.
Yes.
Sorry that was looping.
I couldn't figure out how to close the video so it was looping in
my head while you were talking.
Yeah, and it's also bizarre that you're the one that said it, so I'm like,
is this Gavin whispering in my ear?
Just in a different voice?
You know what I mean?
Like with the AirPod
So
Ben!
I don't know if exactly, if you're like, it's Gavin.
Yeah.
Trying to think as as I try, there's always a good use of this stuff, but yeah.
As MRI mean, I never I never really went down the rabbit hole of the ASMR videos.
But if you're into doing them, it does seem this could be a way to have
like ASMR about whatever you like.
I like fantasy baseball.
I
Oh my god, that's a great idea!
The ASMR fantasy baseball, if you could leave your fantasy lineups,
The New York Yankees Aaron Judge today had an amazing game.
Two home runs, unfortunately, your pitches weren't as great, but it's okay,
I'm sure you'll do better tomorrow.
it seems to me like hyper personalization
is one aspect of AI
that, is unpredictable and I'm sure will play out in fascinating
all right.
So that was what I did with weird ASMR AI this week.
Ben, what have you been playing with, with AI?
This morning I was playing with read AI and having it generate a few questions for
you, co host of the AI for Humans podcast.
I can have you play a couple of those and then maybe I can explain
where I think, this has potential.
Looking back at your time on The Tonight Show, which segment or episode
stands out as a turning point for you in terms of realizing the power
of the content you were creating?
Do you see any parallels with the kind of content AI is making possible to
create now, or could in the future?
Okay, so this is a good question about the Tonight Show.
I think in the Tonight Show times, and really in the late night times, I think
the thing that really made me feel like we were onto something different
was the late night hashtag segment, which was a way to use, at the time,
Twitter, To help start and generate and continue making a conversation with
the audience into a television segment.
One more question.
I took a look at your impressive LinkedIn page.
Great banner art, by the way.
I saw you were an executive producer at NBCUniversal.
What's the craziest idea you pushed that got greenlit?
How did that experience shape your view on AI's impact on traditional media?
Oh, okay.
This is interesting.
So clearly read AI has seen my LinkedIn.
And it's, amazing banner that I've got there.
So I appreciate that.
I'm this is a tricky question because one of the funny things about this, and
this might be an interesting thing for us to talk about is it says EP at NBC
universal and because I had to put it on LinkedIn in some form or another, it
encompasses so many different things I worked on, but it is, it shows in some
ways the slight limitations of what it's like to have to read a piece of material
and then generate questions from it.
Do you know what I mean?
Because,
Totally.
Oh, for sure.
yeah.
yeah.
And I think that's something maybe to dive in on this.
So tell us a little bit about how.
This thing is made for Reed.
And if you're, if, again, if you're not familiar, we're talking about
Reed Hoffman, the former founder of LinkedIn now is very active in a bunch
of investments and Ben works for, as we talked about at the top of the show.
Just an experiment at this stage, but we were already playing around
with doing a video version of read partner with a company called our one.
And we had done his voice with 11 labs.
And then right around that time, we were tinkering with this opening.
I came out with custom GPTs.
And so then like in a matter of 48 hours, we were able to start putting a
lot of reads books, speeches, podcasts.
Into GPT to be able to have read, give answers in a very read like
manner that GPT wouldn't both in terms of the content itself.
So in some of those questions, he's like referencing blitzscaling
and some of his own thinking, but also in the way that he speaks.
He might have phrases.
He says a lot.
I, I noticed when I listened to myself recently, I'm like, I
say, makes sense all the time.
Why do
say uh, uh,
ubiquitous, ubiquitous.
And uh, YouTubers will love to comment on.
Yeah, I had a friend of mine, a comedian was like, the first time you use a
word like ubiquitous, he sounds smart.
The second time it's like, oh, he really just thinks that's a great word.
And I, yeah but similar, right?
If Reed tends to use, a word like brilliant instead of smart,
it should pick up on that.
And so I think that's what made this unique is that, as we're building all
of these different use cases, we've used read AI to, review business plans
at Stanford and give video feedback.
He's done interviews with, Bloomberg and wall street journal, and he's
done, speeches where we translate it to 10 different languages.
All of them were trying to figure out like, how can this be additive?
How can it, do something maybe interesting that you couldn't do with video before.
And so it's combining, yeah.
The audio, the video.
And then Parth, I mentioned before, created this LLM, every, you know,
couple of weeks, it's getting better and smarter and more knowledgeable
about what Reid said in the past.
So yeah, that's the concept behind it.
And then with LinkedIn specifically, it can review your LinkedIn page.
And to your point, sometimes it might pick up on something like artwork, but
other times, it could be limiting and how it thinks it should take a single bullet
point and turn that into a question.
Does this become, I think it's great that Reed's doing this
because I think it opens the door.
First of all, it shows people what's possible.
And in it, in what we were talking about before, even with deepfakes a
little bit, it shows people like, oh, this is something you can both create
for good, but also people could have a version of this that is something that
you have to be aware of what it is.
Is it going to be productized in some way?
What is the use case?
Like, why would people pay for something like this?
Yeah.
I think people will productize it.
I don't think that's what we're looking to do with
this, but initially we created it.
There was this idea of wouldn't it be great to have, feedback
from someone like read as a mentor in your pocket, pull it up.
You're thinking about doing something with AI for humans.
Yeah.
And you can get his perspective and then you can get Steve Jobs perspective and you
get somebody else and you sort of have, different thinking from different types
of, mentors, thought leaders, et cetera.
Or it could be advice from, you know, your dad or your best friend or
whoever you trust.
Reid, you mentioned this is about exploring what's possible, that is
very much, what Reid is looking to do.
Show and tell, he wrote a book with GPT called Fireside Chatbots,
he did this project, he's always sort of experimenting, To
figure out where this is going.
You need to actually use the tools and figure out, and he's on all
of these things all the time.
And I try to do the same thing largely because that's how you
can see where things are headed.
But in terms of like how this will be productized.
Yeah, I think.
Informational content and educational content makes a lot of sense for
these types of digital twins.
I don't think it makes a lot of sense for, a creator who's
opening themselves up to their
community
and being themselves
You want to have a connection with a real
there.
I think you want the real connection.
And then there's other cases like my, I have twins that are 16 and
I'm like, surely we don't need to be paying for an essay to tutor.
There
could be somebody who's watching them, talking to them, explaining how to do
this stuff in real time, interactive.
I'd rather pay for that.
Not that I want to put an essay to tutors out of work, but then they can
do it at all hours and they can, it's customized for them and all that.
So I, yeah, it's a bit of both.
And, it's funny, another one, cause we talked about the grandma lean
video I did.
And on the one hand, I think it was funny to see her, break down
Paul George coming to the 76ers.
It's just funny to watch.
But then on the other hand, to make this video, I interviewed
her for two and a half hours.
And I had like, a lump in my throat the whole two and a half hours.
I was like, I can't believe I haven't had this conversation
before, and she's a hundred.
This woman is remarkable.
Like, I didn't have that.
And I'm much happier that I have that interview than I'm,
you know, Excited that we can make her
rethink, how she would have said
something.
And so on the one hand fascinating that, yeah, people probably will
preserve versions of their loved ones that they can interact with.
But then on the other hand, the thing we could do in 1986, I think people
should do much more of, which is just sit down with the people you love.
Interview them, hear their life stories and have that video preserved.
And there probably will be things with AI that you can then,
ask it questions or whatever.
But like, actually what made that project cool is not
Not
the
I can now,
the connection you
the AI.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, Not to be hokey about it.
I know this is AI for humans,
but,
No, it's the human part.
That It's a human part.
That's
oh, that's true.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And it was funny actually in the early, early in the interview, she's like,
And have you heard about this AI?
Oh my gosh, the things they're doing.
That's what people should leave with this year.
Just go interview the old people in your life so you
get them
on camera.
I had a wild experience.
Actually.
My grandfather died in 1998.
He lost all his brothers and sisters in the Holocaust.
Never talked to him about it
really.
Cause I was young when he
died.
And then um, in like 2005, I was basically Googling myself
and I stumbled into basically 10 hours of interviews with him about the Holocaust
way.
Wow.
it was.
Kind of wild.
Nobody in my family knew it existed.
We had seen like three quotes from this interview in a book, but then
there was like 10 hours of audio tapes
of him recounting the whole experience.
And I did use 11 labs to recreate his voice.
I actually want to do this.
Cause I think this could be an interesting thing where.
It's 10 hours.
Not a lot of people want to sit through 10
hours of him recounting the Holocaust, but you would be able to say, retell
the story in five minutes at a seventh grade level, there's ways to maybe take
this like incredible artifact of him recounting his story of the Holocaust.
And, make it like more, I don't know, accessible for audiences.
But yeah, that stuff is priceless.
And I do, it's funny because part of me feels like a lot of bloggers
are probably now in regular jobs
and it was a bizarre thing to go through.
But if nothing else, they, a lot of them do have this like
incredible time capsule of what they were going through.
Yeah.
Ben, thank you so much for being here.
Where can people find you online?
And what should they check out?
People can find me.
LinkedIn.
This is the first time I've co hosted a podcast.
You're doing
great.
You did a
video a little more.
I appreciate it.
I want to start doing video more, but, yeah, really, it's linkedIn posts.
So let's go LinkedIn, Ben Rellis.
I have a website, real creative.
ai for
something to check out.
We try to curate these different examples of cool AI creative projects.
And then if you go to the top, you can store it by project type.
And we have over 300 creators curated.
I'm just like fascinated by this community of AI creators that are like.
They're not really as focused on like views and money right now.
They're focused on
making cool
experimentation.
I'm sure later they'll want the views and the money more too.
I would say, okay, this is an odd one.
I would say in a little bit of a non sequitur, I would check out some of
the tributes and some of the things being written about YouTube CEO
Oh man.
camp.
I get choked up.
All right,
okay.
Non separate or something to check out.
I would say read some of the tributes to YouTube's um, CEO, former CEO uh,
Susan, who passed away last week.
She was the CEO when I was there for most of my time there.
Remarkable woman.
I admire her so much.
So it's not an AI thing, but it's been fascinating being on LinkedIn because
I just like, I'm reading all these tributes from people that I was really
close with when I worked there and I don't know, it was like Obviously
heartbreaking, but also inspiring to read all these experiences that people had.
So for people in the tech industry that want to read about, you know,
an icon uh, yeah, look up some of those tributes to Susan and what
she was able to do with her life.
She sounds like an incredible person and how lucky you were
to be able to work with her.
And what she did for YouTube is pretty remarkable overall,
And also not just how big YouTube got, but I have to say it was a big
reason I stayed there for so long the culture of that place people really
admired her, and so, like, yeah, in addition to, of course the insane
growth it had over that time period.
I just think she like really was passionate about the people at YouTube,
the creators, and created a culture that made you want to be a part of it.
I
That's amazing.
Ben, thank you so much for coming on this week.
We really appreciate it.
And Kevin, we miss you.
We'll see you back again next time.
But that is AI for Humans, everybody.
We will see y'all next week.
And again, Ben, thank you for being here.
Yeah.
Thanks for having me, Gavin.